Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
The research teamâs direct involvement through engagements with the planning, design, and implementation of many of the systems served to substantiate the information provided by primary and secondary sources.
The regional (interoperable) fare payment systems reviewed in this chapter are â¢ Smar TripâGreater Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area, Maryland, Northern Virginia ( â¢ Trans LinkâSan Francisco Bay Area (ca.gov/projects/translink/translnk.htm) â¢ Chicago CardâChicago, IL ( â¢ Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination (RFC) ProjectâSeattle, WA ( transit.metrokc.gov/prog/smartcard/smartcard.html) â¢ Go-To CardâSt.
Moreover, the findings and current trends both within and outside the transit industry are compared.
Particularly, adding non-transit services (or becoming inter- operable with non-transit services) affects the data elements to be exchanged.
The RCSC will provide services to all Smar Trip participants and operators in the DC, Maryland, and Northern Virginia regions. CTS also received a contract in July 2003 to supply POS devices and the data network concentrator and to make upgrades to existing systems to support the regional program.
18.104.22.168 Fare Policies The following fare policies and customer features define the Smar Trip program: â¢ Card Feeâ card purchase fee; â¢ Fare ProductsâBus and rail fares, parking; â¢ Fare CategoriesâFull fare, senior/disabled, peak, off-peak, distance; and â¢ Other FeaturesâBalance protection/fare replacement, negative balance.Metrorail vendors also vend magnetic tickets for non-Smar Trip cardholding customers; these tickets can only be used in the rail system. N/ADNADNA DNA N/A DNA N/A DNA DNA DNA DNADNA PROFelica PROPRO PRO N/ADNAPRO PROPRO DNA PROIf no, what do you use? 2The current reader for rail (Cubicâs Go CARD reader) is not compliant, but they are procuring a system of buses that will use Cubicâs Tri-Reader, which is compliant and would modulate between Types A and B. 4The cards are not compliant, but the system could be compliant if compliant cards are used. Nil 1 2 8 Nil 5 6 UC Nil 7 Nil Notes: 1Transaction/purse sequence numbers serve to identify gaps in data 2The back-end system does not carry any value so the server will charge the patronâs account, and when the threshold goes below 10 dollars, an email is sent to the patron.An implementation that will expand the Smar Trip functionality to surrounding transit providers is under way. 5The card type is Mifare Type A, which is compliant for Parts 1 and 2, but not fully compliant for Part 4. 9As allowed by ISO 7816, a subset of APDU commands has been implemented. Listed information is âas planned.â Key = Yes DNA = Does Not Apply PRO = Proprietary N/A = Not Available DES = Data Encryption Standard 3DES = Triple DES Findings of Peer Review of Interoperable Sm artcard Program s 31 7 Data-Layer Features W a s h i n g t o n , D C , S m a r T r i p S a n F r a n c i s c o , T r a n s L i n k C h i c a g o , C h i c a g o C a r d S e a t t l e , R F C M i n n e a p o l i s , G o - T o C a r d C e n t r a l F l o r i d a , O R A N G E S V e n t u r a C o u n t y , G o V e n t u r a L A C o u n t y , T A P S a n D i e g o , C o m p a s s L o n d o n , O y s t e r H o n g K o n g , O c t o p u s S i n g a p o r e , E Z - L i n k 1. -Card ID # -Card Issuer ID # No -Patron Profile Code (Age/Disability) No -Patron Language No No N/A No No No No No No No No N/A No 2. -Fare Product ID # 3 3 3 3 N/A -Fare Product Validity Period 3. -Agency ID # N/A -Date/time of specific transaction -Entry/exit location of patron No 4. Also, there is a bonus program that provides 1 dollar back for every 10 dollars spent on the card.â¢ Section 3.2 identifies the commonalities in the information shared among agencies partici- pating in the listed interoperable programs.â¢ Section 3.3 discusses current trends and new developments being considered or pursued within the smartcard programs, including â Payment for parking, bridges, and highway tolls; â Applications for financial institutions and retail; and â Expanded security and biometrics features.